Has anyone heard.....?

heretoday · 04-26-2009, 06:51 PM

What would you do without Fox to give you your marching orders, Frankie? I've been waiting for "keep the change" to appear on your posts for lo this many a week-and-a-half. You won't argue the merits, because you don't know what they are, you are just terrified someone's coming to take something that's yours, and that's kind of sad.

heretoday · 04-26-2009, 06:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by katharina

Interesting... those were the years OUR pockets were nearly picked bare and thank goodness started getting better after that. Guess it goes to prove that there really *are* always two sides to every story, eh?

Uh-oh. OURS and YOURS and neither of you have the slightest idea who you're speaking to. You have no idea who I am and where I come from. The fear of loss, and the hope of gain, is one of the curses given the human race, and you both have got it bad.

Frankie · 04-26-2009, 07:26 PM

Here,
The only thing you can say, rather than argue merit, is "You get your marching orders from Fox". Well I don't and it's pretty clear that you have no idea what you are talking about and that you simply heard a point or two that agreed with your mindset and went with it.

You might be afraid of someone taking what you have worked your entire life for if you had anything worth taking.

Frankie · 04-26-2009, 07:27 PM

Here,
Actually when you pointed out that it was under Clinton that you had money.....and not under Bush, it became pretty clear.

Those who work hard for a living tend do better under Republicans.

katharina · 04-27-2009, 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heretoday

Uh-oh. OURS and YOURS and neither of you have the slightest idea who you're speaking to. You have no idea who I am and where I come from. The fear of loss, and the hope of gain, is one of the curses given the human race, and you both have got it bad.

Uh... I'd respond to this if I had a clue what you're referring to. My post
meant that during the 90s, my husband and I were very bad off financially
and in the early to mid 2000s, things got better. If you want to turn that
into a political thing, have at it. The post just mentioned who the presidents
happened to be at the time.

So... no, I don't know who you are but I'm glad you had money when I
didn't... otherwise, seems as if something may have been misunderstood
here?

heretoday · 04-27-2009, 12:22 PM

I understand exactly. Arguing the merits would be a good idea, Frankie, but you only insult and double-team. Glad to see you're all feeling your oats. Had a good old rave up at your tea bagging party, I see?

Frankie · 05-02-2009, 04:09 AM

Here,
I love liberal hypocrites like you. You complain about insults and then turn around and insult. Either that or you are so ignorant that you really don't understand that tea-bagging is a liberal term and something liberals seem to like.

heretoday · 05-05-2009, 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie

Here,
I love liberal hypocrites like you. You complain about insults and then turn around and insult. Either that or you are so ignorant that you really don't understand that tea-bagging is a liberal term and something liberals seem to like.

And I dislike neocons who can only insult. How about answering fairly posed questions? Or do you think that no one gets to have an opposing viewpoint?
Just to answer your last point: Tea-bagging is a stolen neocon word that doesn't mean what you think it means. How clueless is that? While you're at it, why don't you confess that you guys stole the whole concept from the Ron Paul/ Libertarian party folks? Last question: Why can't we see a proper, areal photo of you tea bagging parties? Were they really as badly attended as that?

Frankie · 05-06-2009, 02:12 AM

Here,
You really need to keep up to date. I've posted on more than one occasion that I am a Libertarian. I just tend to vote Republican because otherwise it's currently a wasted vote. Ron Paul has no problem with the use of the Tea Parties.

The neo-cons didn't invent the phrase tea-bagging nor did they steal it. The term is "Tea Parties". The fact that several of your ilk decided to change it doesn't mean that we have. I realize that you liberals like to "redefine" things (gay, marriage, sex, is) but that doesn't mean we are all going to go along with it. I know that bothers you. Get over it.

You haven't posed any fairly asked questions because you simply do not know how. As a typical liberal you think that only your viewpoint is valid when it's quite clear that your education is as lacking as your intelligence. You limit what you read and view to those things which agree with you and never bother to look any further.

If you want an aerial view of a Tea Party, google it.

If you want to see tea bagging, ask a liberal.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-26-2009, 06:51 PM	#16 (permalink)
heretoday Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 396	What would you do without Fox to give you your marching orders, Frankie? I've been waiting for "keep the change" to appear on your posts for lo this many a week-and-a-half. You won't argue the merits, because you don't know what they are, you are just terrified someone's coming to take something that's yours, and that's kind of sad.

04-26-2009, 07:26 PM	#18 (permalink)
Frankie Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 93	Here, The only thing you can say, rather than argue merit, is "You get your marching orders from Fox". Well I don't and it's pretty clear that you have no idea what you are talking about and that you simply heard a point or two that agreed with your mindset and went with it. You might be afraid of someone taking what you have worked your entire life for if you had anything worth taking.

04-26-2009, 07:27 PM	#19 (permalink)
Frankie Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 93	Here, Actually when you pointed out that it was under Clinton that you had money.....and not under Bush, it became pretty clear. Those who work hard for a living tend do better under Republicans.

04-27-2009, 12:22 PM	#21 (permalink)
heretoday Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 396	I understand exactly. Arguing the merits would be a good idea, Frankie, but you only insult and double-team. Glad to see you're all feeling your oats. Had a good old rave up at your tea bagging party, I see?

05-02-2009, 04:09 AM	#22 (permalink)
Frankie Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 93	Here, I love liberal hypocrites like you. You complain about insults and then turn around and insult. Either that or you are so ignorant that you really don't understand that tea-bagging is a liberal term and something liberals seem to like.

05-06-2009, 02:12 AM	#24 (permalink)
Frankie Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 93	Here, You really need to keep up to date. I've posted on more than one occasion that I am a Libertarian. I just tend to vote Republican because otherwise it's currently a wasted vote. Ron Paul has no problem with the use of the Tea Parties. The neo-cons didn't invent the phrase tea-bagging nor did they steal it. The term is "Tea Parties". The fact that several of your ilk decided to change it doesn't mean that we have. I realize that you liberals like to "redefine" things (gay, marriage, sex, is) but that doesn't mean we are all going to go along with it. I know that bothers you. Get over it. You haven't posed any fairly asked questions because you simply do not know how. As a typical liberal you think that only your viewpoint is valid when it's quite clear that your education is as lacking as your intelligence. You limit what you read and view to those things which agree with you and never bother to look any further. If you want an aerial view of a Tea Party, google it. If you want to see tea bagging, ask a liberal.